<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google DNS Benchmarking and Rationale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/</link>
	<description>Swashbuckler, adventurer, slayer of dragons, commando, storyteller, Internet entrepreneur; explorer of rabbit holes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:01:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zakaria</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5920</link>
		<dc:creator>Zakaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5920</guid>
		<description>I believe most blogger, got it wrong. The real reason google makes public DNS is to destroy all ad-based DNS hijacking whether by ISP or others like OpenDNS. Well it&#039;s good for the customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe most blogger, got it wrong. The real reason google makes public DNS is to destroy all ad-based DNS hijacking whether by ISP or others like OpenDNS. Well it&#8217;s good for the customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPECTRAL-ANALYSIS.INFO &#187; Is Google DNS A Winner?</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5781</link>
		<dc:creator>SPECTRAL-ANALYSIS.INFO &#187; Is Google DNS A Winner?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5781</guid>
		<description>[...] seems to depend wildly from ISP to ISP. If you&#8217;re fortunate enough to have an Internet provider like Verizon&#8217;s FiOS that runs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems to depend wildly from ISP to ISP. If you&#8217;re fortunate enough to have an Internet provider like Verizon&#8217;s FiOS that runs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google免费DNS服务的真实表现 &#171; 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>Google免费DNS服务的真实表现 &#171; 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>[...] Google提供的免费DNS解析服务受到了广泛称赞，Google声称免费DNS能改进浏览体验，使网上冲浪更快和更安全。安全难以衡量，但速度可以尝试。利用免费的DNS基准测试工具，有人发现Google的免费DNS并不快，甚至比许多公共的DNS服务都慢。如果你不相信你的ISP提供了正确的DNS解析，那么使用Google的DNS无可厚非。此外还有人指出，使用Google的DNS可能会在访问国内网站时，被转到该网站位于国外的服务器上，导致访问速度巨慢。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google提供的免费DNS解析服务受到了广泛称赞，Google声称免费DNS能改进浏览体验，使网上冲浪更快和更安全。安全难以衡量，但速度可以尝试。利用免费的DNS基准测试工具，有人发现Google的免费DNS并不快，甚至比许多公共的DNS服务都慢。如果你不相信你的ISP提供了正确的DNS解析，那么使用Google的DNS无可厚非。此外还有人指出，使用Google的DNS可能会在访问国内网站时，被转到该网站位于国外的服务器上，导致访问速度巨慢。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitalFlack</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5745</link>
		<dc:creator>digitalFlack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5745</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any reports from people with AT&amp;T service in their home (DSL or Uverse),  Also would using Google on an iPhone make much difference?

Thanks for any info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any reports from people with AT&amp;T service in their home (DSL or Uverse),  Also would using Google on an iPhone make much difference?</p>
<p>Thanks for any info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Yablon</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Yablon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>Of course there&#039;s always this: It&#039;s a plot. Google just wants us to using &lt;i&gt;their&lt;/i&gt; DNS so they can model traffic according to their nefarious plans (bwah ha ha).

I wrote about this yesterday, by the way:

http://answerguy.com/2009/12/07/google-owns-you-free-dns-faster-internet-youtube/

Jeff Yablon
President &amp; CEO
&lt;a href=&quot;http://answerguy.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Answer Guy and Virtual VIP Computer Support, Business Change Coaching and Virtual Assistant Services&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course there&#8217;s always this: It&#8217;s a plot. Google just wants us to using <i>their</i> DNS so they can model traffic according to their nefarious plans (bwah ha ha).</p>
<p>I wrote about this yesterday, by the way:</p>
<p><a href="http://answerguy.com/2009/12/07/google-owns-you-free-dns-faster-internet-youtube/" rel="nofollow">http://answerguy.com/2009/12/07/google-owns-you-free-dns-faster-internet-youtube/</a></p>
<p>Jeff Yablon<br />
President &amp; CEO<br />
<a href="http://answerguy.com" rel="nofollow">Answer Guy and Virtual VIP Computer Support, Business Change Coaching and Virtual Assistant Services</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two sim card phone</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5723</link>
		<dc:creator>Two sim card phone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5723</guid>
		<description>Wow very interesting results, =) keep them comming...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow very interesting results, =) keep them comming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rosenberry</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5714</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rosenberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5714</guid>
		<description>Here are the same test results as run from my Internet connection in Portland Oregon.  This connection comes from an ISP that is located in the Pittock building which is the same place NWAX.net is located which is peered with Google.  Net result is 3-4ms round trip times to 8.8.8.8.

http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/12/google-recursive-dns-speed-test/

Google&#039;s DNS servers are the fastest (or on par with the fastest) as run from this location.

-Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the same test results as run from my Internet connection in Portland Oregon.  This connection comes from an ISP that is located in the Pittock building which is the same place NWAX.net is located which is peered with Google.  Net result is 3-4ms round trip times to 8.8.8.8.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/12/google-recursive-dns-speed-test/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bitplumber.net/2009/12/google-recursive-dns-speed-test/</a></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s DNS servers are the fastest (or on par with the fastest) as run from this location.</p>
<p>-Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitplumber.net &#187; Google Recursive DNS Speed Test</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5713</link>
		<dc:creator>bitplumber.net &#187; Google Recursive DNS Speed Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5713</guid>
		<description>[...] coverage of this elsewhere so I did not feel compelled to post anything about it until I saw this post discussing how fast Google&#8217;s DNS servers were compared to other ISP&#8217;s servers.  I felt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage of this elsewhere so I did not feel compelled to post anything about it until I saw this post discussing how fast Google&#8217;s DNS servers were compared to other ISP&#8217;s servers.  I felt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google DNS and others &#171; All that is wrong with the world&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5707</link>
		<dc:creator>Google DNS and others &#171; All that is wrong with the world&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5707</guid>
		<description>[...] performance seems to be sufficient, and may well be better than many ISPs own DNS servers. Combined with an increasing number of ISPs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] performance seems to be sufficient, and may well be better than many ISPs own DNS servers. Combined with an increasing number of ISPs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google DNS A Winner? ~ Revelations From An Unwashed Brain</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/12/07/google-dns-benchmarking-and-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-5706</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google DNS A Winner? ~ Revelations From An Unwashed Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=323#comment-5706</guid>
		<description>[...] seems to depend wildly from ISP to ISP. If you&#8217;re fortunate enough to have an Internet provider like Verizon&#8217;s FiOS that runs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems to depend wildly from ISP to ISP. If you&#8217;re fortunate enough to have an Internet provider like Verizon&#8217;s FiOS that runs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

