<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Misunderstandings and Social Media Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/</link>
	<description>Swashbuckler, adventurer, slayer of dragons, commando, storyteller, Internet entrepreneur; explorer of rabbit holes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:48:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark H</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>You better believe I&#039;ll be re-tweeting this. 

In my opinion Twitter has evolved into the greatest way to spread information online.  I have read many articles this week saying twitter&#039;s time has passed, Twitter&#039;s traffic has plateaued they&#039;re through etc...

People forget that only 1 in 5 gen y&#039;ers  use Twitter, but overall they represent the largest demographic on social networks. Just wait until they start &quot;getting it&quot;. Then Twitter will really explode...

I can&#039;t wait to see what happens in the next several months, developers are having a field day with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You better believe I&#8217;ll be re-tweeting this. </p>
<p>In my opinion Twitter has evolved into the greatest way to spread information online.  I have read many articles this week saying twitter&#8217;s time has passed, Twitter&#8217;s traffic has plateaued they&#8217;re through etc&#8230;</p>
<p>People forget that only 1 in 5 gen y&#8217;ers  use Twitter, but overall they represent the largest demographic on social networks. Just wait until they start &#8220;getting it&#8221;. Then Twitter will really explode&#8230;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see what happens in the next several months, developers are having a field day with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeta thompson</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4117</link>
		<dc:creator>zeta thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4117</guid>
		<description>The main problem for me is sifting through the drek. Let&#039;s say I follow a book agent. We have meaningful conversations regarding the publishing business.  
But most of the larger publishing houses do NOT engage in conversation with me, they rather just post updates. If they DID,  they might be surprised at what they would find out what actually impresses me or what turns me off about books, authors and publishing in general.

Yes, tweetmygaming.com  is valuable to many but only if the game mentioned is picked up.  Would a new indie trend actually be noticed if the publisher or game is not in the GamerDNA data base?
tweetmygaming.com  is a great start, but now how to make it better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem for me is sifting through the drek. Let&#8217;s say I follow a book agent. We have meaningful conversations regarding the publishing business.<br />
But most of the larger publishing houses do NOT engage in conversation with me, they rather just post updates. If they DID,  they might be surprised at what they would find out what actually impresses me or what turns me off about books, authors and publishing in general.</p>
<p>Yes, tweetmygaming.com  is valuable to many but only if the game mentioned is picked up.  Would a new indie trend actually be noticed if the publisher or game is not in the GamerDNA data base?<br />
tweetmygaming.com  is a great start, but now how to make it better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4112</guid>
		<description>@Anthony I don&#039;t think it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;just&lt;/i&gt; that people are unsatisfied with the conversational depth on Twitter--I think many of these people don&#039;t realize that conversation is even taking place.

@Binky In some ways, I think that Twitter aggregates all those conversations, and helps spin you back out to the forums/blogs/etc. where the detailed information exists.

@Svenn Marketing is an application of Twitter, just like blogs are.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s &quot;primarily&quot; for marketing.  Twitter helps you sample information about the people you&#039;re interested in--and engage them in conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anthony I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s <i>just</i> that people are unsatisfied with the conversational depth on Twitter&#8211;I think many of these people don&#8217;t realize that conversation is even taking place.</p>
<p>@Binky In some ways, I think that Twitter aggregates all those conversations, and helps spin you back out to the forums/blogs/etc. where the detailed information exists.</p>
<p>@Svenn Marketing is an application of Twitter, just like blogs are.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s &#8220;primarily&#8221; for marketing.  Twitter helps you sample information about the people you&#8217;re interested in&#8211;and engage them in conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svenn</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4110</link>
		<dc:creator>Svenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4110</guid>
		<description>Twitter is primarily a marketing tool though. It&#039;s amazing for marketers and people trying to push something out to the world. For the ordinary person, though, I don&#039;t see much benefit. I get dozens of hits to my twitter from marketing whores who are following everyone they can find just in the hopes of getting people to follow them while they promote some product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is primarily a marketing tool though. It&#8217;s amazing for marketers and people trying to push something out to the world. For the ordinary person, though, I don&#8217;t see much benefit. I get dozens of hits to my twitter from marketing whores who are following everyone they can find just in the hopes of getting people to follow them while they promote some product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binky the bomb</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4109</link>
		<dc:creator>Binky the bomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4109</guid>
		<description>Its the whole on-line text message idea that&#039;s confused a lot of people.  Personally, I only use the main tweet, @ replies and DM&#039;s, not the feeds (not found one worth following, but haven&#039;t really looked at what&#039;s available).  Many people once on-line prefer to speak out, at great length, unrestricted my character count spending paragraphs saying very little.

A text message on a mobile phone is short, sharp and to the point, so why can&#039;t on-line users do the same?  That&#039;s the essential idea for Twitter, say what you mean, be precise.  Lets face it, if most women did the same when they meet people they know is passing on the street (especially if they have a man carrying their shopping) and restricted what they said to 140 characters, we&#039;d all be happier.

Forums and chat rooms have been around for a while now, they are fine for day to day bitch talking, slap downs and general talking of shite, as well at the purpose they where intended for (I.E. Sharing of useful information amongst a group).  If you want to cram in a lot of information, pictures and whatnot in one large informative post, then Twitter is not the place for it, we can all agree.

But the Hardcore message board users will badmouth it and say &quot;I don&#039;t see the point&quot;... because the concept is quite beyond them.  Take me for example, I follow Web Artists, Writers, a few Artist from Marvel comics (who I chat too on occasion), a few friends and a collection of random individuals who actually have something interesting to say.  Under normal circumstances, I&#039;d have to be a member of 9 message boards and 4 private networks in order to keep up to date.

And too be perfectly honest, who has the time?

Hence Twitter, your one stop shop for quick and easy updates to the people you give a damn about.  Short, sharp replies without the hassle, so easy and simple anyone could do it.  Convenience on a pale blue website, who can argue with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its the whole on-line text message idea that&#8217;s confused a lot of people.  Personally, I only use the main tweet, @ replies and DM&#8217;s, not the feeds (not found one worth following, but haven&#8217;t really looked at what&#8217;s available).  Many people once on-line prefer to speak out, at great length, unrestricted my character count spending paragraphs saying very little.</p>
<p>A text message on a mobile phone is short, sharp and to the point, so why can&#8217;t on-line users do the same?  That&#8217;s the essential idea for Twitter, say what you mean, be precise.  Lets face it, if most women did the same when they meet people they know is passing on the street (especially if they have a man carrying their shopping) and restricted what they said to 140 characters, we&#8217;d all be happier.</p>
<p>Forums and chat rooms have been around for a while now, they are fine for day to day bitch talking, slap downs and general talking of shite, as well at the purpose they where intended for (I.E. Sharing of useful information amongst a group).  If you want to cram in a lot of information, pictures and whatnot in one large informative post, then Twitter is not the place for it, we can all agree.</p>
<p>But the Hardcore message board users will badmouth it and say &#8220;I don&#8217;t see the point&#8221;&#8230; because the concept is quite beyond them.  Take me for example, I follow Web Artists, Writers, a few Artist from Marvel comics (who I chat too on occasion), a few friends and a collection of random individuals who actually have something interesting to say.  Under normal circumstances, I&#8217;d have to be a member of 9 message boards and 4 private networks in order to keep up to date.</p>
<p>And too be perfectly honest, who has the time?</p>
<p>Hence Twitter, your one stop shop for quick and easy updates to the people you give a damn about.  Short, sharp replies without the hassle, so easy and simple anyone could do it.  Convenience on a pale blue website, who can argue with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4108</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4108</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, if you go outside Twitter–to the blogs and articles (primarily in the videogame press) you’ll find that there are always commenters such as the following...&quot;

I think some people are just looking for different things. Some gamers enjoy reviews and features with lots of content - especially, if the aforementioned commenters are reading sites/blogs such as IGN, Joystiq, etc. Twitter just doesn&#039;t provide that level of content for them. Seeing a random fellow gamer tweet, &quot;This game is sweet!&quot; is much different (and possibly much less useful) than a gaming journalist composing a five-page spread reviewing a particular title. I agree with you in many ways but also see the other side of the equation, as well. Gamers - your primary audience - having different views/tastes in more than just genres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, if you go outside Twitter–to the blogs and articles (primarily in the videogame press) you’ll find that there are always commenters such as the following&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I think some people are just looking for different things. Some gamers enjoy reviews and features with lots of content &#8211; especially, if the aforementioned commenters are reading sites/blogs such as IGN, Joystiq, etc. Twitter just doesn&#8217;t provide that level of content for them. Seeing a random fellow gamer tweet, &#8220;This game is sweet!&#8221; is much different (and possibly much less useful) than a gaming journalist composing a five-page spread reviewing a particular title. I agree with you in many ways but also see the other side of the equation, as well. Gamers &#8211; your primary audience &#8211; having different views/tastes in more than just genres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCraine</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4103</link>
		<dc:creator>JCraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4103</guid>
		<description>Great article, I&#039;m going to forward this to my Facebook friends who don&#039;t quite understand why I&#039;ve moved on to Twitter. I understand where people who don&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; are coming from - I thought the concept of tweeting took too much dedication. I only joined the Twitter bandwagon 2 weeks ago, and so far it&#039;s nothing what I initially expected (it&#039;s better).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, I&#8217;m going to forward this to my Facebook friends who don&#8217;t quite understand why I&#8217;ve moved on to Twitter. I understand where people who don&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221; are coming from &#8211; I thought the concept of tweeting took too much dedication. I only joined the Twitter bandwagon 2 weeks ago, and so far it&#8217;s nothing what I initially expected (it&#8217;s better).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmallCaveGames</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4100</link>
		<dc:creator>SmallCaveGames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4100</guid>
		<description>Good post - I&#039;ve noticed a similar shift in &#039;tude. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post &#8211; I&#8217;ve noticed a similar shift in &#8216;tude. <img src='http://radoff.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago (@tiagosantana)</title>
		<link>http://radoff.com/blog/2009/06/16/twitter-misunderstandings-and-social-media-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4099</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago (@tiagosantana)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radoff.com/blog/?p=115#comment-4099</guid>
		<description>TweetMyGaming was one of your best idea! :D
Twitter is addictive. &gt;_&gt;
Nice post, dude.
P.S.: 140 characters FTW. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TweetMyGaming was one of your best idea! <img src='http://radoff.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Twitter is addictive. &gt;_&gt;<br />
Nice post, dude.<br />
P.S.: 140 characters FTW. <img src='http://radoff.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
