Usually, I post stuff that’s about technology, social media, or entrepreneurship — often all three. But sometimes I’ll post about something a little different.
The other day I asked on Twitter whether people would prefer to have a replicator or a holodeck (credit for the question idea goes to @fattychubs). Here are the results:
- Replicators won with 61% of the votes.
- The holodeck got 36% of the votes.
- About 3% voted ambiguously, including someone who said they’d rather have a transporter than either of those two.
Many people also shared their reasoning. Amongst people who voted for replicators, the most popular reasons given were:
- Food.
- Various get-rich-quick schemes involving replicating money.
- A theory that you could construct a holodeck by replicating all of the parts you’d need.
- Real objects are better than simulacra.
Amongst people who chose the holodeck:
- Sex.
- Various applications in gameplay or game design.
- Ability to experience the impossible.
- A number of Star Trek experts claimed that replicator technology was part of the holodeck, so you’d sort of get one anyway.
So how about me? I’d choose the Holodeck. I’m a bit dubious about claims that the replicator can duplicate any advanced technology, including the holodeck (particularly whether it can simply generate all the software it would need!) Plus, I think I have enough “stuff” — but my head has plenty of room left for experiences.
Join me on twitter for more discussions about technology, social media, entrepreneurship and science fiction.
on 
on 
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
A few things that may (or may not) have come up about the Holodeck and Replicator’s.
Replicators need a template to work off. Now normally that would consist of having one of said products available and ‘feeding’ it into the replicator first (so you’d still need to buy stuff). True, you could make hundreds from the template, but if the original unit was flawed, so would the copies. Plus whatever you copy is limited in size to the replication port, so unless you go for the BIG ones (which need a building, security and one hell of a power source) your knackered for many business ventures.
Holodecks, good for training, games, simulations and so on. But that comes with problems of its own, for a start, how do you program them? A vast computer banks worth of imaging data of course…. which needs a 3D camera to capture the data. For that, you’ll need a tricorder set-up for capturing three dimensional sensor data. The other options are too A) place objects within the holodeck to be scanned and recorded or B) Feed millions of pictures into the holodeck computer and hope it can extrapolate all the data without freezing up.
If it where me, I’d go for the replicator. Sure it gives out free stuff, but it also uses up a lot of power. If the electric bill is reasonable, I’d keep it. Besides, how many times have you come across the perfect sandwich, packet of crisps (Chips) or cup of coffee and wanted to keep drinking/eating it long after it was done with…? Well, now you can.
And, the replicator becomes a good repository for an increasing amount of stuff too. Got 100’s of books, cd’s, dvd’s and other stuff you don’t want collecting dust, but still want access to them? Just store them in your handy replicator and hey presto, you have more room. When did you last see people having to hang a shelf on the Enterprise D? That’s because they didn’t need them.
Just a few thoughts.