Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley

by Jon on November 10, 2008

One of the things the new Congress can do is repeal — or at least, curtail — the Sarbanes-Oxley regulations.

To those who aren’t familiar with it, Sarbanes-Oxley (also known as “Sox” or “Sarbox”) was implemented after the financial accounting scandals of companies like Enron.  For huge companies, the cost of Sox is relatively small compared to the good it generates.  For larger companies, it might make sense to keep it in place.

Some research has shown that the collective cost to the economy for SOX compliance is $1.4 Trillion. However, that doesn’t account for the disproportionate cost of SOX for smaller companies and startups.   The cost of compliance for a small company can be as much as 2.5% of revenue.  Often, startups are able to go public with revenues of around $50MM — you do the math and decide whether you think this hidden tax is worth it.  Furthermore, the regulation is driving smaller companies to do IPOs in non-US markets.

IPOs and small companies are inherently riskier investments.  We’re not talking about companies that can individually sink large pension funds; but if these companies grow and prosper, their upside potential can be enormous.  Let’s stop preventing them from going public (or worse, exporting our capital markets to Asia and Europe).

Fortunately, Nancy Pelosi promised reform on SOX during this year’s tour of Silicon Valley.  Let’s hope this isn’t forgotten in 2009, and helps make the United States IPO market healthy again.

Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me on Twitter to hear more from me on innovation, games and entrepreneurship. If you'd like to learn how games can transform your business, also check out my book, Game On: Energize Your Business with Social Media Games.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Sachin AgarwalNo Gravatar November 10, 2008 at 11:26 pm

I’ll make you a bet: if SOX is revised, we don’t see an immediate influx of new registrations.

Is there a SOX tax? Sure. Is it what is stopping exits? No way. It’s a lack of companies who are properly monetizing their userbases. SOX isn’t what is keeping Facebook, a company worth ~$5-8B with $300-400 million in revenue, from going the IPO route. It’s not keeping Etsy private.

The public markets have decided that they’re just not willing to purchase the shares of these sorts of companies any more. And the AIM has shown itself to have been a short-lived haven for companies that didn’t deserve to be public.

JonNo Gravatar November 10, 2008 at 11:48 pm

@Sachin — I agree that it won’t create an immediate influx. I’d imagine it could take a year for it to catch up. Nevertheless, I think it’s worth accelerating the process.

GavinNo Gravatar November 11, 2008 at 2:47 am

My only run-in with Oxley-Sarbanes (or one form of it) was as an hourly wager @ Hasbro Inc. where many employees were laid off every 6 months instead of being hired full time. (and then replaced with more hourly wagers, repeating every 6 months)

Didn’t seem to do Hasbro, it’s employees, or the consumer any good

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: